URI Management Call 2016-11-01

Connection Info:

3-4pm Eastern
+1 (641) 715 3660, access code 651025  





  • Functional Requirements doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G2LHArFRW-WdttH_YhNmAjf-Oe9EPZWSZQVap7lenQ8/edit?usp=sharing
    • Review feedback and updates
      • Discussed new comments on downtime/availability and hosting vs support; also discussed new use case
      • Downtime/availability
        • Should Duraspace host this? keep server up and running but would app responsibilities fall on another group?
        • host might not be support
        • need to talk to someone (Hydra Steering) - Julie email
      • New use case re: API for returning terms with labels - 
        • questioning authority gem is hitting LCSH API endpoint (20 results returned)
        • we think how we’re setting things up this can also be used with questioning authority
        • no relevancy in questioning authority
        • not for ranking but for order (name or term vs term in description of vocab)
        • relevancy could be handled by app in search - endpoint would have way to handle relevancy
          • endpoints that work in relevancy - linked data fragments spec
          • could do this with SPARQL endpoint but then questioning authority would have to contain relevancy code
    • Property example mock-ups - Julie starting
      • 2 terms (ss:arkivoChecksum and ss:importURL)
      • both terms in single RDF serialization - either ttl or nt - use nt since that spells out all triples and is easier to use programmatically
      • nt for each term
      • html for each term
      • GitHub Gist to show how these would look
  • Begin working on review process in Predicate Decision Tree, 8c - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oMvVlGuBwD5U1251oxNmTZn7WgkNTj6tF-k1hOYjnac/edit
    • anyone can request, no authentication needed but contact info needs to be provided with request
    • ask HMIG if there’s interest for a WG to support review process
    • ask HMIG for feedback on req doc and decision tree
    • review criteria
      • info about places they have looked
      • info about any properties that are close but won’t work
      • all required info is included