Metadata Call 2016-09-21

Samvera Community Wiki


Metadata Call 2016-09-21

Time: 10:00 am PST / 1:00 pm EST

Call-In Info: +1 (641) 715 3660, access code 651025 

Moderator: @sanderson (BPL)
Notetaker: @Corey Harper (NYU)

Attendees: @sanderson (BPL),  @Corey Harper (NYU), @Hutt, Arwen (UCSD), @Alicia Morris (Deactivated) (Tufts), @Chrissy Rissmeyer (UCSB)

Agenda

  • Subgroup Reports

    • Descriptive Working Group

      • No recent meeting

    • MODS and RDF Descriptive Metadata Subgroup

      • Reviewed access description from rights working group

      • Predominately EDM rights with URI & DC Rights for anything else, including clarifying text

      • Not always supporting rightsholder, but will support if it exists

      • Will be sending out another poll today or tomorrow for remaining issues with collab doc

        • eg. dcterms spatial with URI, as example. Geo Concerns will be using string labels. This would be a conflict. How to handle?

      • Final set of institutional mappings for remaining elements in 4 weeks.

      • This will be followed by final review, at which point mapping should be complete

    • Applied Linked Data Working Group

      • No recent meeting. 

      • Email about interest in meeting. Haven't heard back.

      • Unsure when we'll meet next

      • David Lacy & Corey Harper will both help with the workshop

    • URI Management Working Group

      • Notes available on wiki

      • Predicate decision tree document that people have been commenting on

      • Discussion of URI patterns to be used for those predicates

  • Issues/Questions

    • None

  • Additional items

    • Hydra Connect 2016 HMIG Meeting agenda

      • Thursday, Oct 6, 2-3pm Eastern

      • Comments on agenda?

        • Is it worth explicitly discussing sunsetting?

        • Why the limited participation?

          • Too much else going on in the community

          • Other things that we're waiting on, such as DPLA decisions re: metadata, etc

        • Consensus on this call is that a Metadata Interest Group is still of importance

        • Changing frequency & focus could be helpful

  • Action Item