Time: 10:00 am PDT / 1:00 pm EDT

Call-In Info: 1-530-881-1400, access code 651025

Moderator: kestlund (Univ. of Oregon)

Notetaker: carolyn.hansen (Univ. of Cincinnati)

Attendees:

Agenda:

Applied Linked Data Subgroup

Steven: linked data fragments in a few serializations, working to implement more functionality; active triples in GitHub, James added a license
Steven: stand up on Friday, focusing on getting linked data fragments to a usable level, index functionality, update Solr index labels
Steven: not planning another official sprint, doing standups, carving out time to make code contributions
Corey: likes idea of other sprint, but not at this time
Steven: Goals of what to present at HydraConnect: will discuss on next call

Rights Metadata Subgroup

Karen: reviewing and making comments on recommended descriptive elements, sending out to main list for feedback
Karen: sent email to Islandora and Hydra Tech List regarding access rights

i

Descriptive Subgroup

Carolyn: Group was going to deploy survey this week, but heard from User Interface Group that they would like to have a call with the subgroup. Working to get this set up and will deploy the survey after. Corey volunteered to work on agenda for meeting with User Interface Group
Steven: MODS subgroup meeting time is 9pst/12est on every other Monday, starting July 27th, MODS and RDF Descriptive Metadata Subgroup

Interest Group and Working Group model

Karen: chartered out of Hydra Tech, interest group charters different working groups, should metadata be an interest group instead, b/c of clear deliverables we made it a working group, does it make sense to have a standing interest group? (The model we have now will work fine for initial deliverables for HydraConnect)
Corey: what are the practical differences? Is this mostly a semantic difference?
Karen: Getting encouragement from steering committee to change to interest, since working groups can be temporary
Julie: If metadata WG needs to last and changing to interest group helps that, it's fine

Keeping Track of Metadata WG Requests and Priorities

Karen: need an open and better way to track metadata projects, would like to create metadata repository in Project Hydra Labs
Julie: are other interest groups management projects through this?
Karen: no, don't think so.
Corey: Moving to Hydra Labs, it makes it harder to contribute because of the licensing issues. Would feel awkward posting to Project Hydra since NYU isn't a Hydra partner
Karen: b/c content is not mostly related to code, Github may not be best place. Would Islandora folks care about posting to Project Hydra?
Nick: don't think so
Julie: it gets hard to find stuff if we spread out issues on different systems
Karen: Should we try in GitHub, or add a page in Confluence?
Julie: maybe try it in Confluence, and if it can't be managed well, we have more of a reason to switch to Github
Corey: another possibility would be to create Google Group, onep lace, searchable with subject lines
Karen: there is some resistance to any new Google Groups. We'll start with a new Confluence page
Julie: if multiple people can help, I'm willing to
Karen: that would be great

WebACLs and use cases: Design - WebAccessControl Authorization Delegate

one of the rights metadata was to align hydra access controls with WebAccessControl
contacted Andrew Woods, just getting under way, if people on metadata group could comment on the link and add use cases (within the next week)
working on getting someone in Islandora on the next sprint

HydraConnect Presentations

Karen: could we have each subgroup do a 20 minute presentation and additional breakout sessions?
Corey: that's a lot of content, not sure we have enough to fill that time
Steven: be fine if we shared a 20 minute block w/ the other groups, lightening talk styles
Julie: what if we have an Hydra Metadata WG session and then divide it up however makes sense? maybe 30-45 minutes total?
Karen: I think this will be the approach

Additional Items

Corey: is there a way of communicating about sessions/slots/presentations for HydraConnect?
Karen: HB2015 program, using Waffle to organize -- it's public but draft - not to be considered final, just another way to view confluence page, https://waffle.io/pbinkley/HC2015-program, official list of workshops will be going up soon

Action Items

Karen: either Esme or I will send out rights metadata recommendations for comment
Group members should comment on use cases for WebAccessContol, Design - WebAccessControl Authorization Delegate
Karen will start Confluence page about issues, requests, etc.