survey closed with 18 responses - have not been analyzed yet
still working on predicate decision tree
discussed use of opaquenamespace and the MODS and RDF proposal
next meeting in 2 weeks
Do any working groups need time for meeting at
Hydra Connect 2016? Conveners/facilitators can contact email@example.com to request meeting time. Details below regarding request (HMIG needs to figure this out as well).
Julie does have access to a firewall-ed Sufia 7 test install at IU and has tried some things and become confused (yay!) - she would love to share her desktop and show you all what she is seeing and talk it through with other Hydra/metadata folks - is there interest in a Google Hangout?
From the Program Committee: " Based on feedback from last year’s Hydra Connect, the Program Committee for this year’s event are minded to have distinct blocks of time for unconference sessions on the one hand and WG/IG meetings on the other. It is likely that the WG/IG meetings would follow the unconference time so that newcomers to Hydra could sensibly leave after the unconference block if they have not yet developed an interest in WG/IG work.
In order to help scheduling, please will each active WG/IG convenor email us at hydra-...@googlegroups.com to indicate whether or not their group wants a meeting and, if so, how long they would like (0, 1, 2 or 3 hours – bear in mind that the longer you ask for, the more difficult it will be to accommodate). Likely you will want to discuss this on your next call. The Program Committee will do their best to accommodate these requests but make no promises!"
Julie thinks we should ask for some time (1 hour is probably long enough) but what do others think? We could discuss what has been learned about PCDM at Hydra Connect and any goals for the next year. We could also discuss/meet whoever might be taking over as new HMIG facilitator?
Groups will report back on need for time at HydraConnect