Samvera Community Wiki
URI Management Call 2017-01-24
Connection Info:
3-4pm Eastern
+1 (641) 715 3660, access code 651025
Notetaker: @Juliet Hardesty
Attendees:
@Juliet Hardesty
@Ryan Wick
@sanderson
@Don Brower
Agenda and Notes:
Functional Requirements doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G2LHArFRW-WdttH_YhNmAjf-Oe9EPZWSZQVap7lenQ8/edit?usp=sharing
To Do: Use case to review: RDF that doesn’t work well for Hydra/Fedora environment (PREMIS, MODS)
Is mapping round-trip-able? yes, it can be, but might not get back exact detail in MODS
make changes, sounds good
To Do: change list of fields in "For People" section based on comments and Predicate Decision Tree fields
Who created: might need this for asking questions; when using Github this is just part of what you can have with user ids; maybe use email address? need a property - maybe dcterms:creator
When created - date created and date modified both good to have
look at adding optional field for skos relationships (as defined in Functional Requirements doc)
add as optional on Predicate Decision Tree and group together in one bullet point
can be helpful as part of review process to prove what has been found/not found
Hosting and Support
subdomain to use - currently vocab.projecthydra.org and projecthydra.org/ns have both had mentions
CurationConcerns/Hyrax already using projecthydra.org/ns
predicates that already exist would have to redirect either way
present to Karen and whatever subdomain is easier to implement or if Hydra Partners have a certain way it should be, that is fine
properties in place using hash URL: https://github.com/projecthydra/active_fedora/blob/a641a8f0d65e7c01f395eeb58c5e87c638395e2e/lib/active_fedora/rdf/project_hydra.rb
need to figure out how these redirect to vocab manager
URI Selection Working Group
number of people - 8-10 people; 4-5 people switching off every 6 months; use majority for voting and require quorum (5 people)
reject proposal, accept as-is, accept with changes
add to draft charge
Ryan might be interested in starting off facilitating
review process
maybe leave it for working group to define?
make suggestions
request comes in, they come together in meeting (person making request can be asked to join the meeting), gather info to research for certain amount of time and then come back together to make decision or suggested changes
Write-up to describe vocab manager - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q62Hqrd-yChCrfWQ1sxDhPl6CtS-3KrQWX6HdB-ZNQc/edit?usp=sharing
change URIs in mock-ups to projecthydra.org/ns URI
Time to check-in with Karen Estlund re: Phase 1 dev?
doing this after HMIG meeting on Jan. 31