Rights Subgroup 2015-05-20

Participants:

• Esme Cowles, chair (UC San Diego)

• @Nick Ruest

• @matienzo

• @Sharon Farnel

• @Chrissy Rissmeyer

• @Justin Simpson

• @kestlund

Agenda

1. Call for agenda items

2. Review outstanding questions from 5/6/15 meeting:

   1. Rights Metadata Working Group#OutstandingQuestions

   2. Any feedback?

   3. Move forward with a proposed recommendation?

Notes

• Outstanding

  • Do we need embargo + license at the same time

    • ETD with CC license and embargo

    • Could put CC license in dc:rights, and use copyright status to record base rights

      • Implicit in CC that something is under copyright

    • Redaction could be done using access restriction

  • Copyright status/jurisdiction

    • Good way to handle the copyright baseline

  • dc:rights vs. dc:license

    • dc:license could be a good way to record licenses, but probably want to avoid duplicating dc:rights

  • Core/Minimal recommendation, with recommended extensions

    • copyright status/jurisdiction and dc:license are good extensions

    • recommendations for notes for further comments

  • archiveshub:useRestrictions

    • used by OregonDigital

    • has a ArchivalResource domain, so maybe too restrictive

    • could use edm:rights for main rights statement, and dc:rights for free text notes/restrictions

      • or dcterms:rights for rights statement and dces:rights for free text