Rights Subgroup 2015-05-20

Participants:

• Esme Cowles, chair (UC San Diego)
• Nick Ruest
• matienzo
• Sharon Farnel
• Chrissy Rissmeyer (she/her)
• Justin Simpson
• kestlund

Agenda

1. Call for agenda items
2. Review outstanding questions from 5/6/15 meeting:
   1. Rights Metadata Working Group#OutstandingQuestions
   2. Any feedback?
   3. Move forward with a proposed recommendation?

 

Notes

• Outstanding
  • Do we need embargo + license at the same time
    • ETD with CC license and embargo
    • Could put CC license in dc:rights, and use copyright status to record base rights
      • Implicit in CC that something is under copyright
    • Redaction could be done using access restriction
  • Copyright status/jurisdiction
    • Good way to handle the copyright baseline
  • dc:rights vs. dc:license
    • dc:license could be a good way to record licenses, but probably want to avoid duplicating dc:rights
  • Core/Minimal recommendation, with recommended extensions
    • copyright status/jurisdiction and dc:license are good extensions
    • recommendations for notes for further comments
  • archiveshub:useRestrictions
    • used by OregonDigital
    • has a ArchivalResource domain, so maybe too restrictive
    • could use edm:rights for main rights statement, and dc:rights for free text notes/restrictions
      • or dcterms:rights for rights statement and dces:rights for free text