2018-03-02 Governance WG Meeting notes
- rsteans
- Maria Whitaker
Date
Attendees
Goals
- Ensure all WG members understand next steps
- Incorporate ideas from WG into feedback review and incorporation
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review of Webinar | Ryan |
Real time discussion - in the webinar - feedback PPT was helpful to work through language of rec - get to the principles Steering is reacting quite a lot - Do more of: Lay out here's the reasoning, so here's how this text addresses the proposal Case that if we were too wishy washy, it might not have been taken seriously. AI: Get that meeting with Steering so they understand what we're doing What we've done is an accomplishment AI: Wiki Page next time for people who are there - AI: Ask Carolyn if we can see who was live | |
| Calendar - |
| ||
| Next Steps - Reviewing Feedback | Ryan | No feedback as of 1:45 Central - | |
| Next Steps - Incorporating Feedback | It'll depend on how much feedback we get, how we want to resolve that feedback, Large group review, then an organizational review by smaller squad, then send back forincorporation | ||
| Voting mechanism for Partners | Mark if available | COmmunity votes - Paid slack, naming, final naming - Traditionally we did lazy consensus, accept and accumulate feedback in +1, 0, or -1 People who don't support have to say why We should announce vote fallback - go consensus direction, vote on areas lacking consensus Let everyone know ahead of partners meeting, a vote will be held and we're looking for unanimous consensus, and if we don't get that Come up with an institutional consensus SImeon - vote doesn't need to be secret Nabeela - One email per institution - steering has a list of those email addresses, but those emails might be a UL or legal. Some technical level. If Partner list - hope that everyone in Community has someone on the partner list. Announcement of vote goes to partners - but votes we need to determine Simeon - Consensus of more than a single updown/ more of community feels like they're participating - but more voices equals more conflict AI: Articulation of process - consensus to formal vote Let's move forward with a +1, 0, 1 - with comment Make it clear all people on Partners can vote - make it clear everyone can express their opinion |