CCMWG - 10/01/18
Attending
Time:12:00PM PDT/03:00PM EDT - 01:00PM PDT/04:00PM EDT
Zoom: https://princeton.zoom.us/j/397525264
Participants
@Trey Pendragon (Princeton University Library)
@Benjamin Armintor (Columbia University Libraries)
@Mark Bussey (DCE)
@James Griffin (Princeton University Library)
Agenda
Review the Retrospective for Sprint 2
Capture any additional feedback from those who were unavailable on 09/24/18
Preparation for Samvera Connect
Lightning Talk
Notes
Sprint 2 Retrospective
Pendragon:
This is the opportunity for retrospective feedback for the last sprint and the WG as a whole
Should we recharter?
Seems like most are in favor or rechartering...when should we do it?
Armintor:
Shared their feedback in the Slack Channel
Unavailable due to illness last week
Bussey:
Joined in 15:05 EDT
Really likes the idea of rechartering...appreciates all of the time and effort invested by all members
Feels that it would be useful to perpetuate this WG
Also, feels that this is healthy on a number of levels for community maintenance
Pendragon:
This Working Group officially ends at the conclusion of Samvera Connect 2018
We can probably move to recharter during SC, and put out a call for participation
Bussey:
How do we encourage participation from the community for those currently in the role of Product Owner?
Pendragon:
It would be valuable to better define the expectations of Product Owners as contributors
Samvera Partner Meeting
Bussey:
Can volunteer to be there at the Partner Meeting...
Pendragon:
Armintor is going to be present at the Partner Meeting
Lightning Talk at Samvera Connect
Pendragon:
Is there going to be a plenary event in which we issue IG and WG updates?
Armintor:
There is going to be an opportunity for plenary checkin, but this was recently decided
Bussey:
Uncertain, but this is likely for quick summary updates
Pendragon:
Will investigate this, and these updates would render the proposed Lightning Talk unnecessary
Here is an outline of what we achieved:
We ensured that Product Owners were identified for core components
We deprecated certain components which this WG did not feel could be maintained by us
We brought core components up to community-defined standards
Is this representative of what we've achieved over the last year?
Armintor:
Identifies that the understanding of the community standards for core components within the WG were not quite adequate
We needed to discuss tracking contributions at the Partner level and individual level for components
We needed to discuss the state of licensing for each component
The state of maintainable APIs and semantic version tracking for each component were also points of uncertainty
These were important outcomes which should be noted
Breakout Session at Samvera Connect
Pendragon:
There are many scheduling conflicts if we're holding it for just our members
Unless we want others to attend, maybe we should not sign up for a slot
Conversations such as what would be held could just as easily take place during the call
Agreed, this WG is not going to sign up for a slot
No additional agenda items were identified for discussion during this final meeting
Armintor:
Will be drafting a list of talking points to be shared with us
Also, there will be a follow-up from a call being held on Thursday
Please look out for these communications
Meeting adjourned at 15:17EDT