SUI - Personas
Researcher/Professor
Behaviors and Beliefs
no time to learn new tasks
expectation that online tools should be easy to use
- little familiarity with licensing and copyright restrictions
Goals and Needs
grant agency requirements to deposit peer-reviewed publications into OA repository
depositing items himself (not using grad student or admin asst)
embargo period requirement
wants to share content on deposit
would like integration with other systems to avoid duplication of effort (eg researcher profiling tools, faculty annual reporting requirements)
organize documents in personal collections
create, edit, delete, and structure works
extends to works and files within a work as well
save a work
work stays in “draft” state until it’s decided to be complete
publish or unpublish a specific work
upload documents and enter metadata
upload multiple documents to a single work (e.g. paper, presentation, dataset)
upload multiple documents each to a separate work (e.g. multiple papers uploaded at one time)
upload a “batch file” to quickly create complex works
A “batch file” will be parsed and works will be created according to the structure and data therein.
E.g., a spreadsheet populated with work-level metadata, a ZIP archive that has the intended sub-work hierarchy reflected in its file directory structure, etc.
see stats on own work
wants to view history of activity performed on a work
wants to associate his/her name with ORCID
wants to have a profile page that aggregates all his/her articles
wants metadata auto-fill during ingestion such as using DOI to pull that information
- wants to link different works (e.g. publication and data) both within the repository and between the repository and an external source.
Core Characteristics
desired degree of control over metadata: Medium
desired degree of control over files: high (read: “versioning”)
frequency of use: Infrequent
- first time user: YES
Research Assistant
Behaviors and Beliefs
uploads research on behalf of department or Researcher
might be tapped by a PI/faculty to submit content for a lab/project
might want to upload his/her own research
Goals and Needs
organize documents in personal collections
upload documents and enter metadata
see stats on his/her own uploaded works/files
- need to see his/her documents as separated from the documents uploaded oh behalf of somebody else
Core Characteristics
desired degree of control over metadata: Low
frequency of use: Moderate
- first time user: Yes
Repository Tech
Behaviors and Beliefs
Creating / uploading content is focus of his/her job.
Doesn't feel she has decision-making authority
Doesn't have expertise in the content area
Goals and Needs
Upload documents or images and enter metadata
Upload hundreds to thousands of documents or images at one time, in a variety of configurations into works / collections.
Expects to find metadata from another source (finding aid, OPAC)
Uploads and metadata creation should be mediated by a content expert.
Core Characteristics
desired degree of control over metadata: Low
frequency of use: High-use
first time user: No
Curator
Behaviors and Beliefs
Item-level expert in his collections
Wants to use authorities and standards but still values local data conventions
More focused on digital humanities than digital collections
Believes digital object should drive use of physical object
Goals and Needs
Needs to batch upload files into a work
Needs to ingest very large files
Wants to associate different objects or file types with one another
Wants to integrate objects with other collections across the organization
Wants to provide digital objects as touchstones for more experiential digital projects (like online exhibits, games)
Needs to approve/deny an item becoming public
- Wants the flexibility of managing metadata schema of individual collection
Core Characteristics
desired degree of control over metadata: HIGH
frequency of use: Sporadic
first time user: NO
Archivist
Behaviors and Beliefs
Supervises proxy/tech/student work
Collections-level expert
Believes digital object should drive traffic to collection-level finding aid
Believes digital organization & description should reflect physical & intellectual organization.
Feels ethically obligated to restrict private information / materials
Goals and Needs
Needs to ingest a moderate (1-2 dozen) number of files into a collection, in a variety of works configurations:
All files onto one work
Each file onto its own work
X files onto Y works, where X > Y
Needs to upload new versions of files
Needs to provide different levels of access (including embargoes and leases) per work
Needs to assign roles for a specific collection
Needs to control all content within a specific collection
Wants a 2-way data relationship with a more authoritative collections management system
Needs to integrate into a robust digital preservation system, or feel confident about minimum preservation functionality in repository
Wants a mechanism of importing/exporting contents from Sufia (could be command line or similar to OAI-PMH)
Wants version control
Core Characteristics
desired degree of control over metadata: VERY HIGH
frequency of use: HIGH
first time user: NO
Repository Administrator / Manager
Behaviors and Beliefs
Wants people to use the repository (deposit into, and find and download items from)
Wants control over all items, collections and users
Needs administrative functions that allow her to effectively manage users and items
Primary stakeholder in decision-making for end user functionality
Works closely with end-user groups and individuals, recruiting content, troubleshooting issues, marketing repository
Values access to repository, dislike “silos” - importance of items being discoverable via high use tools (google scholar)
Tech savvy but not a developer
Goals and Needs
find & edit all items, collections, users
wants easy-to-use dashboard functionality, and speedy load times for large volume of content
deeply invested in functionality for end-users
wants to see metrics at item, collection, and user levels (and generate/export reports)
wants to be able to communicate easily with users in the system
wants to be able to highlight successful collections and users on the home page without having to get into the code.
Wants to be able to correct bad metadata in bulk
wants provenance/event for collection and item about history of changes and motivations
Core Characteristics
desired degree of control over metadata: VERY HIGH
frequency of use: HIGH
- first time user: NO