Date
Attendees
Goals
Discussion items
| Time | What | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 min | Review feedback on the Governance Review document | Steering has reviewed; review their feedback; make any relevant changes. | |
| 30 min | Discuss potential paths forward for developing a governance model recommendation | Two paths to consider:
| |
| 10 min | Wrap up and confirm action items |
Action items
Notes
We did get our document in on time. We're leaving the document open for review. Still encouraging people to make comments other places.
Potential paths forward for consideration:
The next stage is to draft a proposed model - by February 16th
1)Can map components from Porposed models that are out there to list of desired attributes - we can divide that up, synthesize components into one model
2) each team take one desired attributes and come up with a model to match the attribute
Can he a cohesive, unified model with a piecemeal process?
People hated the ALA model but is the Red Cross/ Apache model may be better
Evviva - ALA is really top heavy
Develop models in pairs? - more cohesive approach -
We may have more wiggle room - getting something to partners meeting and getting it to people prior to the partner's meeting
Do we know the problems that we're trying to sort out? - The attributes are a polite way of saying what the issues are.
- Roadmaps often aren't community defined.
- Stable communication isn't taking place.
- Formal contributions from partners aren't always clear.
- Relationships between groups aren't clearly articulated. Ex: difference between Steering and Partners
There is a reason Michele is here. He wasn't part of prior conversations.
Might make sense to break up along lines - based on why we're here. 3 of each kind. In order to address anxiety issues - we'll need to go back to Steering via Mark. Once we're in teh covo, it'll be more clear how to use Mark.
- Community not in governance group (avviva, nabeela, simeon)
- Community in governance group (maria, michele, anna)
- Facilitating the group (carolyn, ryan, rosy)
Drafting a model based on those desired attributes - each group has one attribute and will design a model based upon that attribute
Plan to address anxiety - just table that until we're getting plans out. Think about it as we're writing out our models.
"clearly articulated relationships" tied to "new roles"
Given Evviva's schedule -