...
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Action Items | All | ||
| Roadmaps Survey / next Partner Call | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ksZrKJrTlBAKoBVwuW_IiGUH0rjKdB1TnDXZjJb9ZfM/edit | ||
| Metadata group service provider representation | |||
| Task Review | All | ||
...
- Request for additional agenda items
- Partners Meeting conversation
- E-Mail from Simeon on Friday, where they volunteered to work with Steering in order to present on June 12th (the next Partners Meeting)
- Present the survey results and brainstorming exercise
- Are we ready to continue with this work given the community loss?
- If so, what are we going to present during the Partners call?
- If we are not ready, we could always postpone; there is always another Partners Call
- Nabeela can work with Simeon and Carolyn, and bring it back to work with Jon and Rob
- This would provide time for finding the expectations of Partners
- Maybe, then, the presentation can be delayed until July
- Rob accepts either timeline
- Nabeela will take the proposed approach where they work first with Simeon and proceed with the presentation for the July meeting
- Roadmap Survey
- Are there any other action items from the survey results?
- There were some specific things that Roadmap Council members needed to address for the council members?
- No, this seems like a situation where further conversation will be needed
- Are there any other action items from the survey results?
- Jen represents the Metadata Interest Group
- Julie represented for servic