Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Review the Retrospective for Sprint 2
    • Capture any additional feedback from those who were unavailable on 09/24/18
  • Preparation for Samvera Connect
    • Lightning Talk


Notes

...

Sprint 2 Retrospective

Pendragon:

  • This is the opportunity for retrospective feedback for the last sprint and the WG as a whole
  • Should we recharter?
  • Seems like most are in favor or rechartering...when should we do it?

Armintor:

  • Shared their feedback in the Slack Channel
  • Unavailable due to illness last week

Bussey:

  • Joined in 15:05 EDT
  • Really likes the idea of rechartering...appreciates all of the time and effort

...

  • invested by all members
  • Feels that it would be useful to perpetuate this

...

  • WG
  • Also, feels that this is healthy on a number of levels for community maintenance

Pendragon:

  • This Working Group officially ends at the

...

  • conclusion of Samvera Connect 2018

...

  • We can probably move to recharter during SC, and put out a call for participation

Bussey:

  • How do we encourage participation from the community for those currently in the role of Product Owner?

Pendragon:Need to greater

  • It would be valuable to better define the expectations of Product Owners as contributors


Samvera Partner Meeting

Bussey:He can

  • Can volunteer to be there at the Partner Meeting...

Pendragon:

  • Armintor is going to be present at the Partner Meeting


Lightning Talk at Samvera Connect

Pendragon:

  • Is there going to be a plenary event in which we issue IG and WG updates?

Armintor:

  • There is going to be an opportunity for plenary checkin, but this was recently decided

Bussey:

  • Uncertain, but this is likely for quick summary updates

Pendragon:

  • Will investigate this, and these updates would render the proposed Lightning Talk unnecessary

...

  • Here is an outline of what we achieved:Brought
    • Product Owner fulfillment
    • Deprecation of certain components
      • We ensured that Product Owners were identified for core components
      • We deprecated certain components which this WG did not feel could be maintained by us
      • We brought core components up to
      standard
      • community-defined standards
      • Is this representative of what we've achieved over the last year?

    Armintor:

    • Expectations of what the WG understood the standards were...were Identifies that the understanding of the community standards for core components within the WG were not quite adequate
      • Tracking We needed to discuss tracking contributions at the Partner level and individual level ...
      • Licensing discussions...
      • Maintainable for components
      • We needed to discuss the state of licensing for each component
      • The state of maintainable APIs and semantic version tracking for each component were also points of uncertainty
    • These were important outcomes which should be noted


    Breakout Session at Samvera Connect

    • Pendragon:
      • There are many scheduling conflicts if we're holding it for just our members
      • Unless we want others to attend, maybe we should not sign up for a slot

    Pendragon:

      • Conversations such as what would be held could just as easily take place during the call
    • Agreed, this WG is not going to sign up for a slot


    Additional No additional agenda items ?were identified for discussion during this final meeting


    Armintor:Draft

    • Will be drafting a list of talking points

    ...

    • to be shared with us
    • Also, there will be a follow-up from a call being held on Thursday
    • Please look out for these communications


    Meeting adjourned at 15:17EDT

    ...