...
First part: How were the check-ins? How was the planning?
Griffin:
Check-ins were tight and direct.
Planning were built off of how the first sprint was undertaken. It was wise to focus on a smaller set of issues than many assumed was possible.
Couldn’t help but notice the capacity for the sprint seemed to vary. Is there some way we can improve outreach for the community to try and bring in more volunteers?
Would hate to see the group rechartered and the same members come on board and find themselves in position where their time is in short supply.
Was helpful to take on more technical issues.
Feel the group has been helpful and fills a niche within the community that needs to remain in place. Helpful to developers who are dedicated towards solution bundles such as Hyrax, given that it gives a larger sense of responsibility and facilitates task delegation. Anyone interested in participating in the review process it’s useful to have a body of people to contact if gem releases need shepherded etc.
Johnson:
Capacity, reflected in structure of group
...
See if there are any other items to discuss before looking to recharter
Adjourned at 15:19 EDT