...
- Community not in governance group (avvivaevviva, nabeela, simeon)
- Community in governance group (maria, michele, anna)
- Facilitating the group (carolyn, ryan, rosy)
...
"clearly articulated relationships" tied to "new roles"
Given Evviva's schedule -
Group 1 simeon, anna, ryan - Stable Communication/ coordination plan
Group 2 maria, Carolyn, Nabeela, - formal contributions
Group 3 rosy, michele, evviva - Community defined roadmap or plan
In formal contributions - there may be articulated relationships - how do we say that the work done (code or on groups) is recognized? - Clearly articulated relationships is infused throughout.
Idea that we'd each write a draft document? Need at least an hour and a half for the next session? -
Give ourselves an extra week to get it out to everyone.
Small groups taking two weeks to develop - will discuss together on the 16th - will synthesize and meld together
Tell Mark we need another week. Not going to get everything synthesized until the 23rd. We will have something for Partners week of March 5th? March 5th open up for comments. 12th-15th synthezising. 16th - get it out to the community.
Set voting deadline immediately after Partners? Keep the ball rolling. Propose voting take place by early April 5th. Just has to take place within two weeks - can set deadline any time within two weeks.
Do we do a presentation at the beginning of the Community review? - This stuff is complicated when we read it on paper - and not everyone processes data the same way. February 19th - March 2nd.
Hold a recorded webinar week of February 26th -
March 2- March 16 - revise based on feedback - Send on March 19
AI: Separate Docs but all public to each other -
Use the Friday normal timeslot to meet.
AI: One meeting 90 minutes on the 16th, small groups meet next week
Hold a vote April 2nd - 9th