Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Attendees:

What are our institutions requiring for web accessibility?

Indiana University

  • University has site license for Site Improve

    • report ran in the fall, failures are mostly related to local customizations

    • Hyrax-specific failures related to empty table on file information page, UV

  • University requires WCAG AA compliance

University of Cincinnati

  • University has mandated change management process which requires that all deploys pass a security and accessibility check

  • University has site license for AMP

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

  • University has site license for Site Improve

  • Currently in process of running Site Improve report for WCAG AA

What should Hyrax require for web accessibility?

We are not sure what standard our community institutions require for web accessibility and would like to gather this information

  • Rebekah Kati will ask in the February Hyrax Interest Group meeting, January Repository Managers meeting

  • Perhaps this could be a Partner meeting agenda item? Rebekah Kati can ask Heather

  • Another option could be a community survey

How could web accessibility work be accomplished?

It would be helpful to automate the accessibility audit process as much as possible

  • Could the community pay for access to a tool like Site Improve? Alternatively, perhaps an institutional license for Site Improve might allow it to crawl nurax?

  • Are there open-source alternatives to Site Improve?

If we cannot automate the accessibility audit process, we can use browser plug-ins such as axe or WAVE

If the audit generates enough tickets, a community effort might be appropriate.

  • No labels