Date
Attendees
- Collin Brittle
- Kevin Musiorski
- Steve Van Tuyl
- Jessica Hilt
- Brian McBride
- Michael Joseph Giarlo
- scossu
- Lynette Rayle
Goals
- Understanding of State of Hyrax Roadmap
- Identification of Possible roles/ outcomes
- Identification of Meeting schedule
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | Why are we having this IG? | SVT | |
| Intros - Your name, university, role - Samvera involvment in one sentence | RJS | ||
| Current Status of the Roadmap | SVT | ||
| Areas where we need help (ex: bulk stuff, valkyrie, analytics round 2, accessibility) | SVT | ||
| Towards the End | Meeting Times and Interest Group Guidelines | RJS | Samvera IG/WG Framework |
Action items
- @
NOTES
Clear to a lot of people that it's a lot of work to tech lead and product own a roadmap as everyone's local needs hit up against community needs. Steve is 20% PO and Mike is 20% as technical lead. A good opportunity to call on the community to bolster this work. We can do a better job of PO'ing and TL'ing in a way that makes sense.
Build a group of people who could bring a lot of different persepctives - all of whom want to see the roadmap completed.
David - so Steve is still PO? Or more of a vote structure? Or is Steve making hard calls.
SVT: Still a PO and TL. Time and scope limitations - this body of people can advise the hard calls. SVT can be mouthpiece as we come together.
And if it turns out that the committee doesn't work - if another structure could be better, we can go that way. This structure makes sense for now.