...
- Welcome
- Facilitator arouner
- Discussion of conference "satisfaction survey"
- What were some of the problems we encountered that might be avoided?
- Were there ways the committee ran that could be improved?
- Possible recommendations (from survey and beyond) for 2019:
- Reduce platforms/tools to use in planning/delivering Connect...GitHub, wiki, Google forms/drive etc.?
- Which are essential? Are there other tools that could cover multiple tasks that should be considered?
- Define and limit use of Sessionizer–use only for lightning talks and unconference?
- Identify someone to work on Sessionizer in initial call for committee members?
- RG: try not to scatter lightning talks around lots of spots, maybe a block of 3 or so, maybe or not on presentations day...
- RG: things we might want to think about...RG suggesting maybe have the second hour of poster sessions be for lightning talks
- this would help with conflicts
- Brian recommended sched.com to use in place
- What is the timeline for calling for Program Committee volunteers and for it to be set?
- Write up of these suggestions, for Program and Host Committees respectively, by 2/19?
- Could we gather and reorganize some of the materials from the past year and previous years, to identify required tasks and timelines, for a more complete picture of what is needed for Connect planning?
- Additional items