...
- Action Item:
- Provide permissions for other users to edit the Confluence Pages for Samvera
- Which kind of issues should be made
- Botimer
- ActiveFedora
- License is there, Apache 2
- Copyright statement from 2011 for Stanford and MediaShelf
- Do we want to continue to update the dates on the copyrights?
- No proper legal entity to hold the IP
- One retains copyright to the code itself (not transferred with Apache for foundations)
- Community-distributed copyright is held by all new code
- ActiveFedora
- Pendragon
- Create a ticket with the maintenance label
- Our responsibility is finished if product owner needs to determine if the license statement is accurate
- Botimer
- This group might be expected to resolve licensing questions
- Pendragon
- That may be more appropriate for Steering to determine
- Botimer
- Is it worth creating an issue in active_fedora?
- Pendragon
- Only go as far as asking the product owners if it is okay
- Armintor
- Samvera is not an organization which can hold rights
- Governance WG: Do CLAs have an obligation regarding rights statements?
- Are the licenses in line with the contributor CLAs?
- E-mailed Steering
- Gemnasium
- Does not exist anymore
- ActiveFedora has a badge for this service
- Should we explore GitLab auditing?
- Create an issue for that?
- Pendragon
- Created a ticket to remove it
- GitHub audits for free (it is no longer necessary)
- Create an issue to remove it
- Documentation links to Dive into Hydra
- Should suffice in place of installation instructions
- Documentation point 11
- Contributors...have they all signed the CLAs?
- Is this WG responsible for doing those checks?
- Pendragon
- Contributor list is public
- Always check the CLA...it's been socially enforced
- Botimer
- There is a CLA bot for GitHub
- Might be at the level of individual repositories
- Bess had to leave at 03:17 EDT
- Botimer