Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  •  Update the term components council to roadmap council
  •  Update the overview section to talk about the documentation we've generated being available to future working groups
  •  Add a qualifier to say July or end of summer at the latest
  •  Remove the requirement for in person once per year
  •  “Will elect a Chair and Chair-Elect from among their membership”?  And membership”  And let Steering sort it out how in the bylaws.
  •  

Other action items

  •   

Meeting Notes

...

  1. Partners will have input to decide on order of which position will be hired first - Technical or Community Manager position.  Yay or nay? Do we say Tech Manager first?

DuraSpace could take on some features and roles.  Have transitional staff take care of it.  that might lead us to want to hire one or the other first.  Constraining that process when we don't know the funding - what parts of those jobs does Steering want done?  What are the pieces we need filled?

A person would do tech coordination if he knew that there was a place to fall back.  

Job would likely fall under DuraSpace - DuraSpace would handle the funds.  

We are in agreement - needs of Community will drive the hiring


  1. Principles for contribution model added - Partners will develop a contribution model which will get voted on, based on 4 Principles - Do we need to include all the verbage and brainstorming in this document?

In case of verbage - keep as appendix - Remove verbiage but keep the principles in place


  1. Contribution Model–new WG or this one?

We will charter a new WG.  Will be approved by majority 2/3rds


  1. Resolved what happens when a PO steps away

...