Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

We don't invalidate community licensensing by making changes - existing steering changes - few more councils weigh in - but they can change governance in any way they want.

The vote is for choosing partners to steering and electing partners

  1. We request Steering to implement rec of electing body 
  2. Placing contribution requirements on partners (specific charter for a group to set contribution model that will be voted upon cash/ time)
  3. Hiring centralized staff depending on funding
  4. Establish more formal organization via a components council

If there was dollar tiering in this rec, couldn't support that - community contributions


Feedback falls into a few categories - 

rec - vote would be a further fleshing on recommendations that probably exist

  1. Steering is to be an elected body 
  2. COntinue fleshing out the plan


Draft a paragraph - what we think this vote means - and mechanism

Draft paragraph 2 - that we will address the feedback


whatever role component council has will be voted on later - we have these areas we need to tackle


The working group will address these things - will ultimately be worked out with input from among the partners - each one of these things 


we may tap you