Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Discussion re: project board items
  2. Other discussion
  3. Facilitator & Notetaker for next meeting
    1. Facilitator:
    2. Notetaker:

Action items 

 


NOTES

Jen - First business - review project board

It looks like the A-Z index is done.  Back to in progress - trascribe the PI interview.  Needs to be converted into Something we would publish.

Questions from Justin and Giarlo.  In a state to be handed off, can be edited later.  Pretty much last ongoing in-progress ticket for longterm, high level goals.  

Bess - is going to close some open tickets that have been open a while.

Jen - We had good responses from our writer/ editor person.  Two people who seem like great writers, good experience.  APITia - liked her background.  She gave us some rates.  We can submit to Steering Committee.

4 hours work - transcribe interview.  Take a look at the API.  $250/ hour.  

What this is, why it's important, what this will cost, 

AI - Ryan will write this up.

What's in ready and grooming the backlog

-Bess - ton of documentation on Hyrax/ Shibboleth connection.  Making a ticket.  Documentation will live in DCE Playbook, but will make a page in Samvera GitHUb/ IO - will have a page there with a pointer to DCE documentation.

DCE sees it as a lead generator, and they have control over the documentation to make sure it's solid for their clients.  If it were shared documentation.

AI:  Bess will set up page in DCE and a link-page at Documentation website

Likely this will be the way to do it.

Jen - a paragraph intro?  Yes. - bess  Bess will provide explanatory text.

Collections Extension - Lynette wrote great documentation for it.  

How to coordinate testing for release - hoping for Julie or Lynette to take a look at Jen's writing.

Where should documentation live in documentation? 

Under release process? - Developer Community/ Releases - a page created "Release testing" under Development Community.  

Should we create a Release Testing Community? - lots of uses for this.  Jen can maybe move it under that link.  In addition to Julie's work.  Tell Community about it at the Tech Call tomorrow.  

AI - complete the "Release testing" hierarchy/ naming convention, move items in there

CHange name from "Real Life Hyrax" to something more explicit - check out what Hyrax should look like


Lynette - if there was a server like Nurax that IS the latest release - can always go to latest site and check against the Nurax to see if its a bug or a local issue.

Bess - is the reason its not being used that way because its also our latest release.  Not current stable release, its thecutting edge release.

Bess - we're setting up Demo that's a stable release with some branding.  The thing is - that one needs to be demo-able.  It needs to be a sales/ demo Demo box.  

If DCE did that would that meet your need?

Maybe a third one - Stable or vanilla?  Drew - one where you could set up sub-domains.

Nurax_testing, Nurax_QA  etc... naming conventions  - 

AI - Bess will look into QA_Nurax with Mark B

AI - Document what the installed versions are, links to those are and what they're used for.