...
- Collin Brittle
- Kevin Musiorski
- Steve Van Tuyl
- Jessica Hilt
- Brian McBride
- Michael Joseph Giarlo
- scossu
- Lynette Rayle
- Chris Colvard (Deactivated)
Goals
- Understanding of State of Hyrax Roadmap
- Identification of Possible roles/ outcomes
- Identification of Meeting schedule
...
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | Why are we having this IG? | SVT | |
| Intros - Your name, university, role - Samvera involvment in one sentence | RJS | ||
| Current Status of the Roadmap | SVT | ||
| Areas where we need help (ex: bulk stuff, valkyrie, analytics round 2, accessibility) | SVT | ||
| Towards the End | Meeting Times and Interest Group Guidelines | RJS | Samvera IG/WG FrameworkInterest Group/Working Group Framework#InterestGroups |
Action items
- @
NOTES
Clear to a lot of people that it's a lot of work to tech lead and product own a roadmap as everyone's local needs hit up against community needs. Steve is 20% PO and Mike is 20% as technical lead. A good opportunity to call on the community to bolster this work. We can do a better job of PO'ing and TL'ing in a way that makes sense.
...
David: batch edit and bulk import export
Jess: Is there a list somewhere that I'm missing where that's occurring?
Link to Roadmap document in the chat.
Steve - maybe what this is - pulling things out of Google Doc of ongoing projects - a wiki page for each project and how it fits on roadmap.
Lynette - is this group well set to faciliate this - policy regarding how you get things on the roadmap - self-identify what people want to do -
Good outcome of this group for making it easier for the community.
Chris - Might want to set up processes so Pull Requests getting reviewed, issues being groomed. Feels like a need for that sooner than later.
Steve - Chipping away at labeling issues yesterday - time and experience-wise may want to spin off and take that on, would be helpful.
Lynette - core committers can be on-deck for a few days at a time to do PR reviews and grooming. Specified things they do - we may need a few people on deck at a time. PR's may not be in someone's specific area.
Steve - ties back to Core Components working group is having. PR out related to Component - tap PO for that PR and see if we can build out that way.
Lynette - wouldn't hurt to have a list of who knows what in specific areas. Would be nice to know - who has worked with search builders (example)
Chris - Place to start may be reviewing and changing who is on the list of code reviewers on GitHub. 9 people listed, 4-5 are no longer involved. Few who can take time to do the review.
group review of PR's - maybe tag onto the Samvera Tech call - spend a few minutes going through reviews, PR's.
STEVE: A lot of things to do next -
SLACK Group - Jess fire up a Slack group
Ryan schedule next meeting
Action Items:
- Collect all documents for the roadmap in one location (Steve)
- Good idea to include a section of the roadmap to identify what hyrax is NOT going to be - scope, what are we trying to get to (Group)
- What is the process for identifying work and proposing ideas? (Group)
- How does one gather resources for the work? (Group)
- Build a hyrax page for all the things on the roadmap (Steve)
- Subgroup for grooming labelling PRing etc. (Chris organize?)
- Lists of devs who are skilled in particular areas (related to Core Components WG stuff) - is core components working on building this? (Steve contact Ben Armintor)
- Review list of Hyrax code reviewers on GH… (maybe Chris and Lynette?)
- Hang on after samvera tech call for review and issue triage (Steve organize)