...
| Time | What | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 min | Review feedback on the Governance Review document | Steering has reviewed; review their feedback; make any relevant changes. | |
| 30 min | Discuss potential paths forward for developing a governance model recommendation | Two paths to consider:
| |
| 10 min | Wrap up and confirm action items |
Action items
- AI: One meeting 90 minutes on the 16th, small groups meet next week
- AI: Separate Docs but all public to each other -
- Group 1 simeon, anna, ryan - Stable Communication/ coordination plan
- Group 2 maria, Carolyn, Nabeela, - formal contributions
- Group 3 rosy, michele, evviva - Community defined roadmap or plan
Idea that we'd each write a draft document? Need at least an hour and a half for the next session? -
Give ourselves an extra week to get it out to everyone.
Small groups taking two weeks to develop - will discuss together on the 16th - will synthesize and meld together
Notes
We did get our document in on time. We're leaving the document open for review. Still encouraging people to make comments other places.
...
Given Evviva's schedule -
- Group 1 simeon, anna, ryan - Stable Communication/ coordination plan
- Group 2 maria, Carolyn, Nabeela, - formal contributions
- Group 3 rosy, michele, evviva - Community defined roadmap or plan
In formal contributions - there may be articulated relationships - how do we say that the work done (code or on groups) is recognized? - Clearly articulated relationships is infused throughout.
Idea that we'd each write a draft document? Need at least an hour and a half for the next session? -
Give ourselves an extra week to get it out to everyone.
Small groups taking two weeks to develop - will discuss together on the 16th - will synthesize and meld together
Tell Mark we need another week. Not going to get everything synthesized until the 23rd. We will have something for Partners week of March 5th? March 5th open up for comments. 12th-15th synthezising. 16th - get it out to the community.
...