Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Goals

  • Understanding of State of Hyrax Roadmap
  • Identification of Possible roles/ outcomes
  • Identification of Meeting schedule

...

David:  batch edit and bulk import export

Jess:  Is there a list somewhere that I'm missing where that's occurring?

Link to Roadmap document in the chat.  

Steve - maybe what this is - pulling things out of Google Doc of ongoing projects - a wiki page for each project and how it fits on roadmap.  

Lynette - is this group well set to faciliate this - policy regarding how you get things on the roadmap - self-identify what people want to do - 

Good outcome of this group for making it easier for the community.

Chris - Might want to set up processes so Pull Requests getting reviewed, issues being groomed.  Feels like a need for that sooner than later.  

Steve - Chipping away at labeling issues yesterday - time and experience-wise may want to spin off and take that on, would be helpful.  

Lynette - core committers can be on-deck for a few days at a time to do PR reviews and grooming.  Specified things they do - we may need a few people on deck at a time.  PR's may not be in someone's specific area.  

Steve - ties back to Core Components working group is having.  PR out related to Component - tap PO for that PR and see if we can build out that way.  

Lynette - wouldn't hurt to have a list of who knows what in specific areas.  Would be nice to know - who has worked with search builders (example)

Chris - Place to start may be reviewing and changing who is on the list of code reviewers on GitHub.  9 people listed, 4-5 are no longer involved.  Few who can take time to do the review.  

group review of PR's - maybe tag onto the Samvera Tech call - spend a few minutes going through reviews, PR's.  


STEVE:  A lot of things to do next - 

  •