Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Welcome 
  2. Facilitator arouner
  3. Discussion of conference "satisfaction survey"
    1. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1m9q1us7p3vBlmp1LLJDVOpKZD5Y4buDNS9AA21e-eIw/edit#responses
    2. highlights?
  4. What were some of the problems we encountered that might be avoided?
  5. Were there ways the committee ran that could be improved?
    1. Possible recommendations (from survey and beyond) for 2019:
    2. Reduce platforms/tools to use in planning/delivering Connect...GitHub, wiki, Google forms/drive etc.?
    3. Which are essential?  Are there other tools that could cover multiple tasks that should be considered?
    4. Define and limit use of Sessionizer–use only for lightning talks and unconference?
    5. Identify someone to work on Sessionizer in initial call for committee members?
  6. RG: try not to scatter lightning talks around lots of spots, maybe a block of 3 or so, maybe or not on presentations day...
  7. RG: things we might want to think about...RG suggesting maybe have the second hour of poster sessions be for lightning talks
  8. this would help with conflicts
  9. Brian recommended sched.com to use in place 
  10. What is the timeline for calling for Program Committee volunteers and for it to be set?
  11. Write up of these suggestions, for Program and Host Committees respectively, by 2/19?
  12. Could we gather and reorganize some of the materials from the past year and previous years, to identify required tasks and timelines, for a more complete picture of what is needed for Connect planning?
  13. Additional items