...
Summarize the inconsistency, make a proposal for better consistency to vet amongst ourselves and take to the Partners
Pendragon
More immediately, finish this document for the proposal, submit it to the WG for review, then prepare it for submission to Partners
Botimer and Armintor will finish this, highlighting the problems regarding the maintenance of the documentation within those repositories
Feels that some significant changes might require input from attorneys
Botimer
Still feels that the current state of affairs would cause institutions to hesitate before contributing to the software (if reviewed by their attorneys)
Pendragon
Mark Bussey
Link out to shared code of conduct
Botimer
Goal is consistency...likes the concept
It really doesn't matter...if we have a script which applies the template
The other content is boilerplate
Does not have a strong stance
This is an interaction outside of the source code...so it might not be best that its in the source code
If the body of the Code of Conduct can be readily integrated...
Pendragon
Linking out is more efficient, but checkmark from GitHub is best for metrics
Should try out having it out in individual repositories, and if it becomes a problem, then address it
Has the CoC changed in the past four years?
Added to the Wiki, and then just updated with the name Samvera