...
- Action Item:
- Provide permissions for other users to edit the Confluence Pages for Samvera
- Which kind of issues should be made
- Botimer
- ActiveFedora
- License is there, Apache 2
- Copyright statement from 2011 for Stanford and MediaShelf
- Do we want to continue to update the dates on the copyrights?
- No proper legal entity to hold the IP
- One retains copyright to the code itself (not transferred with Apache for foundations)
- Community-distributed copyright is held by all new code
- ActiveFedora
- Pendragon
- Create a ticket with the maintenance label
- Our responsibility is finished if product owner needs to determine if the license statement is accurate
- Botimer
- This group might be expected to resolve licensing questions
- Pendragon
- That may be more appropriate for Steering to determine
- Botimer
- Is it worth creating an issue in active_fedora?
- Pendragon
- Only go as far as asking the product owners if it is okay
- Armintor
- Samvera is not an organization which can hold rights
- Governance WG: Do CLAs have an obligation regarding rights statements?
- Are the licenses in line with the contributor CLAs?
- E-mailed Steering
- Botimer