...
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
15 min | House keeping: update about phone call with Mark and Richard; see re-written intro in doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DtKOO8MJTU7k6svMrvO2lM_ZrMep1-6s0xVOSf05PUI/edit?usp=sharing notes from the meeting: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ja_ZgJVjBea8EH-DoVRs3JVk6ya8q-kX_iPHKsKufaE/edit | Rosy, Carolyn, Mark | |
60 min | There are 11 items that need to be decided. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DtKOO8MJTU7k6svMrvO2lM_ZrMep1-6s0xVOSf05PUI/edit?usp=sharing
| Rosy, Carolyn |
|
15 min | Recap the sending out, the voting, next steps | Carolyn, Rosy, Ryan | |
Components Council versus Roadmap Council - Because Avalon and HyRax are not technically Components - and not hosted in Hyrax Github |
...
- Update the term components council to roadmap council
- Update the overview section to talk about the documentation we've generated being available to future working groups
- Add a qualifier to say July or end of summer at the latest
- Remove the requirement for in person once per year
- “Will elect a Chair and Chair-Elect from among their membership”? And let Steering sort it out in the bylaws.
Other action items
Meeting Notes
Housekeeping: Mark, Ryan, CC, Rosy, Richard Green - talk about what we're actually voting on -
...
Steering Meeting in person once per year- yay or nay?
Cost may be problematic - remote participation? Financial lever to that. Recommend f2f - but remote for those who can't be there. Don't codify that you HAVE to be there in person (tie steering to existing events),
Are meetings cumpolsory? If you miss X meetings, you're out? AGREEMENT: Remove language for in-person attendance
Can we just say - “Will elect a Chair and Chair-Elect from among their membership”? And let Steering sort it out. ⅓ restriction comment.
Have them sort it out. We just like Chair and Chair Elect! AGREED
Partners will have input to decide on order of which position will be hired first - Technical or Community Manager position. Yay or nay? Do we say Tech Manager first?
Principles for contribution model added - Partners will develop a contribution model which will get voted on, based on 4 Principles - Do we need to include all the verbage and brainstorming in this document?
Contribution Model–new WG or this one?
Resolved what happens when a PO steps away
Support Simeon’s comments about Components Council making language stronger?
Standing Working Groups? Do we need this?