...
- Note Taker: Hui Zhang
- Discuss Design next steps with Gary Geisler- see Gary's questions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O2ZOOb6yRdV-ISAhZp56RoUxG8S08MvRLWv0Rctnd3g/edit#.
Gary clarifies that not all his questions needed to be resolved for design but it will come eventually when developers create issues. Here is the privatization: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pKEYL6-xp5qo-A-5FjpO-tsgRYZiyBvKXGHRiqp43ww/edit?usp=sharing and https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O2ZOOb6yRdV-ISAhZp56RoUxG8S08MvRLWv0Rctnd3g/edit#- Download can happen to file, so could we use 'file' instead of 'object' in definition?
- The term 'access' is ambiguous
- Gabriela suggests that 'access' can be a synonym of 'view'. Will change the documentation accordingly to use 'view' consistently.
- Aggregation of statistics - this issue needs some major clarification
- Should avoid 'double-counting' with aggregation: the committee will take action to in the coming week to think about how statistics should be counted at different aggregation levels.
- dashboard (R2, R3):
- the dashboard is designed to show the top n collections (not all of them), look at 'report' for details of statistics of all collections (comments from Gary). A mockup from Gary on difference of dashboard vs. report will be helpful for discussion.
- the committee should clarify what information should be included such as Analytics (usage) and administrative activities.
- date range (R4):
- the committee agree that a single date controller for the dashboard and the date range picker for generating reports
- a mockup will be helpful to everyone on board of the decision
- R5, R6: access is the synonym of view
- R7: it is ok to have a calendar widget for generating reports
- R8:
- the committee need to clarify how aggregation works to Gary
- R9: the committee need to decide whether the term 'object' equal to 'file'?
- R10: a total number is also needed for author profile etc.
- R11: duplicate to R15
- R12: similarly presented like R10 but a different statistics item
- R15: the committee agrees that
- a moving window of 12 months of activity. for a new repo, the orphan months would just be blank.
- R16:
- R14, 15 are for the report
- R16 is on both the file and work showpages
- Review MS 1 prioritization: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pKEYL6-xp5qo-A-5FjpO-tsgRYZiyBvKXGHRiqp43ww/edit#gid=0
...