09/25/20
Date: 09/25/20
Time: 09:00 PDT/12:00 EDT - 10:00PDT/01:00EDT
Zoom: https://princeton.zoom.us/j/7739591625
Participants
- James Griffin (Princeton University Library)
- Kate Lynch (Princeton)
- Collin Brittle (Emory)
- Randall Floyd (Indiana University)
Agenda
Notes
- James can schedule an open meeting to prioritize and review the open issues on the GitHub board
- This should be done for next week
- As a task in this meeting, we should verify which Issues might have actually been completed and should be closed
- (There were multiple issues which may have been resolved with new Gem releases)
- James will need to review the Samvera Tech. Call notes
- There was one discussion item in the past regarding signing Gem releases, and this should be a new GitHub issue
- There are also just likely outstanding issues
- Branch Renaming WG
- Kate and Collin have been heavily involved in this
- The WG is on a hiatus until Jan 2021
- GitHub, as of October 1st, will be using `main` as the primary branch name (please see https://github.com/github/renaming)
- There will be GitHub-supported tools
- As a result, there will be a hiatus, but much progress was made on a document from July onwards
- Branch Renaming WG is going to look to deprecate `master` from all repositories in January
- Coordination with the Core Component WG is going to be needed, and we will be providing resources
- Please see the document: Recommendations for the Component Maintenance Working Group
- There is a spreadsheet documenting the ongoing progress of the WG in renaming repository branches
- When the Renaming WG reconvenes in January, there will be a discussion regarding updates
- The date for the initial meeting is yet to be determined
- Starting testing
- Testing using the tool https://github.com/mheap/github-default-branch is encouraged, with the simpler cases being tested
- Forks are potentially problematic, there has been no testing yet
- #branch-renaming-wg is the Channel on Slack, please use this for communication
- Question: Can https://github.com/samvera-labs/huborg be extended for assisting with any of this?
- It's not quite structured to restructure branches and commits, but instead is optimized for opening pull requests between multiple repositories
- Automation is going to be avoided for the initial testing (out of concern for potentially losing code in the repositories)
- Testing
- Question: Does the tool actively work against the repository upstream? Or can it be tested on the local environment?
- It does work locally and upstream
- The recommendation document does address this, and Lynette Rayle tested this against a placeholder repository
- Question: Does the tool actively work against the repository upstream? Or can it be tested on the local environment?
- Kate and Collin have been heavily involved in this
- Meeting adjourned at 09:25 PDT/12:25 EDT