ACTION ITEMS:

New action items:

Draft rampup doc including why we're pausing and how we're going to complete the work (Jeremy Friesen )
Outline document for the CCMWG (Kate Lynch )

Carried over items:

Kate Lynch will work through Lynette’s document using Esme’s script
Write shell script that presumes the github-default-branch script has run, this script would update local usage (Jeremy Friesen )
Dev Congress Proposal of Samvera Labs cleanup and promotion of Labs (Jeremy Friesen )
Spreadsheet for Samvera Labs to show what we've migrated and what remains (Collin Brittle )

Agenda

Guidance Document for CCMWG

Review action items from last week

Chris Colvard (Deactivated) - Added to github-default-branch page, most notes in bold and end of checklist
Kate Lynch - still needs to do walk through with Esme's script
Test renaming repos:
- Jeremy says Lynette poked at a github.io repo (does Lynette have any notes?)
- Jeremy deferred renaming waiting for github discussion
- Kate deferred as well
Local checkout script: Jeremy Friesen has poked at this with a ruby script
- does validation checks
- can supply from/to names
- user confirmation before action taken
- still work in progress but will wrap up next week
- Kate will help test
- https://github.com/jeremyf/dotzshrc/blob/trunk/bin/clone-branch-fixer
Dev Congress proposal - Not done yet
Spreadsheet to help with migration of labs - Not done yet; Collin Brittle will work on this today

Github announcement discussion

github covering all of our use cases? Maybe? What about updating wiki pages, devops work tools, etc.
This WG should wait until end of year and re-form then keeping an eye on GH until then?
All in agreement that waiting for GH support best.
Need to watch the scope of GH support and prepare tools/instructions for cases not covered - wiki pages, our docucumentation (like CONTRIBUTING.md)
Why is waiting a good idea?
- Reduced cognitive load
- Less disruptive technically
- GH is helping solve the problem and can help support if arise issues
- Mindful of our resources
Need to decide and writeup about how we're keeping a watch on things and how we're going to ramp back up
Goal: pass off doc to CCMWG and let them implement it
Action item: draft rampup doc including why we're pausing and how we're going to complete the work (Jeremy Friesen )
- See Hiatus for Branch Renaming Working Group
Action item: outline document for the CCMWG (Kate Lynch )