Attendees:

Minutes:

Proposed Agenda (didn't actually discuss):

Reminder: Some IG requirements from Hydra:

At least three organizations must be represented in an interest group.
Interest groups should be active, but may still exist when all of the participants are inactive.

Check-in Takeaways

7 responses
All but one archivists/librarians - so we’re not a developer centered IG, no surprise
The scheduled monthly call mostly works — but I am open to different times if enough people feel that’s justified.
Still an interest in connecting our discussion to developers in order to facilitate development, largely through documentation
Two responses mentioned interest in exploring Rights metadata/modeling
In the spirit of a true interest group, focus less on deliverables and more on exploration (topics, guest speakers, demos, etc.)
(Only) one respondent said Ben Goldman rulz

Ok, but back to Deliverables/Activities:

Would like to move forward on diagramming DACS (proposed at SAA HAIG workshop).
- Maureen Callahan from Yale interested in this; Kayla from UMich has also expressed interest
- Anyone else?

Brainstorming Future topics (maybe organize these for the whole Hydra community, too?):

Suggestion from Justin, Artifactual: asking Ben Armintor to demo/discuss how he has implemented a Fedora-based PCDM model with Archivematica AIPS
Having UMich/Artefactual demo processing tab?
Sam at Educopia/BitCurator Consortium is documenting archival workflows at many institutions

Browser not supported