...
Roll call by timezone per following order - ensure notetaker is present (moderator)
folks outside North and South America
Eastern timezone
Central timezone
Mountain timezone
Pacific timezone
folks who were missed or who dialed in during roll call
- Remind everyone to sign in on agenda.
- Welcome all newcomers!
- Agenda (moderator)
- Call for new agenda items (moderator)
- add agenda item here
- Moderator & notetaker for next time
- Moderator:
- Notetaker:
- After call, this week's notetaker should create the agenda for the next call:
Open template agenda titled "Samvera Tech Call 2018-xx-xx"
- Click on ... in the top right corner, and select copy.
- Popup will open for location. It should contain:
- Space: Samvera
- Parent page: 2018
- Select copy. New page should be created.
- Modify the title to remove "copy of", update it with the next date, add moderator, notetaker, and any carry-over agenda info. Click Publish.
- PR Review (Julie Allinson )
- Review issues:
- PR review coordinator for next time:
Notes
Updates on the Hyrax 3.0 Release (Tom Johnson)
Not much has changed since the report during the tech. call held last week
Hyrax Working Group is currently sprinting...and some work gotten merged since addressing IIIF-compliant viewer updates
There is an expectation or hope is that a beta will be ready by the end of the sprint
That might be ambitious, as all want to get support for Blacklight 7.0.0 integrated into the beta release
However, there is no BL7 release yet…
Hence, the hope is to get a beta release out by the end of the year
Questions Regarding the IIIF Updates for Hyrax
Hyrax needed to update the Universal Viewer
There were several reasons for this:
There is a security issue in the version which ships with Hyrax by default
There is some interest in getting versions of UV in with support for newer IIIF Presentation APIs
It must be noted that Chris Colvard pushed an abstraction which permits one to replace UV with other viewers
Hyrax/Valkyrie Information Gathering (Andrew Myers)
During Samvera Connect, it was decided that, before there could be any work to integrated support for Valkyrie in Hyrax, there must first be some discussions around requirements
There was a channel created on Slack (#hyrax-valkyrie)
There was also a survey for Valkyrie on Hyrax issued
This is a Google Doc for survey question ideas
It is used right now for data gathering, identifying which version of Hyrax one is using, what are the plans to upgrade Hyrax...
The goals should be to elicit the pain points of this Valkyrie/Hyrax integration
Who has good ways of asking this question?
Lynette Rayle:
Requesting similar feedback, looking to ensure that the wording and order of the questions on the survey make sense
Hyrax Pull Request Review