Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

  • Hyrax 4.0 Release Planning

    • We are not ready for 4.0

    • Previously, community maintained 3.x and maintaining 2.x

    • Now with Valkyrie, 4.x releases need to be supported along with the ActiveFedora Hyrax for 3.x

      • Will 4.0 need to come sooner with Rails 6/Blacklight upgrades? These would introduce breaking changes

        • Valkyrie may need to, then, become a later release

      • If this is the case, Rails 6/Blacklight would need to be a higher priority

        • Perhaps this can be prioritized for the Dev Congress?

        • Currently, this work is ongoing, but we do not know where the community will arrive during May

      • Do we have a sense of what proportion of the community are still on 2.x, and what their path to upgrade is looking like?

        • At a minimum, Hyku may still lock adopters to 2.x releases

        • Max is aware of implementations which currently use 2.x releases

          • How can Samvera support smaller or less-resources institutions in upgrading to a more recently-released, supported version?

      • When was 3.x released?

        • Approximately one year ago

        • During the past, 2.x releases were motivated by those institutions which required these updates for their own custom implementations

      • Might it be possible to propose a timeline for ending support for 2.x releases following the 4.0 release?

        • Do we have a set of standardized practices regarding the length of support for each major/minor release series?

        • We do not, but it is suspected that we implicitly promise that the test suite will continue to pass for 2.x release branches

        • James needs to ensure that CircleCI nightly test suites are running for main branches for samvera components and samvera-labs projects